Passivity isn't neutral—it's quietly expensive.
I learned this the hard way.
For years, I let my wife lead our child's development. She researched, she engaged—I coasted. Not a conscious choice, just the path of least resistance. Then the gap appeared. Dinner conversations about homework and teachers felt foreign, like I was overhearing rather than participating. That distance hurt. The silence was the catastrophe. I'd drifted away from something precious without noticing.
Small delegations become instinct. In investing, I defaulted to the easy path: buy and hold, set and forget. When interest rates spiked in 2021, signaling massive shifts in markets, especially real estate, I shrugged them off. Early warnings surfaced everywhere. But passive strategies demand passive minds. Reality eventually hit, bringing sharp frustration. Not from lack of knowledge—but from ignoring my own instincts.
Technology amplifies everything except judgment. AI can build products, generate insights, automate decisions. But it can't replace the understanding that comes from wrestling with problems. We mistake automation for comprehension, trading depth for convenience. Tools should extend our thinking, not replace our judgment.
What looks like efficiency slowly becomes distance. Each shortcut adds another layer between you and what matters. Until one day, you're just watching your life instead of living it.
It’s easy to let things run on autopilot until reality hits.